Just keeps on booming every time a physical shop goes bust.
1 Like
Crikey. ÂŁ300 million 
2 Likes
It is paying ÂŁ265m for the brands and a further ÂŁ30m for the stock.
The administrators added that the deal was expected to complete on 4 February.
âŠabout 300 people currently employed by the brands in design, buying and retail partnerships would transfer to Asos.
However, neither Asos nor the administrators made any mention of the thousands of people who worked in the brandsâ store networks, nor what will happen to their jobs.
Some more information from ASOSâ RNS
FY20 online and retail partner revenue of c.ÂŁ265m; split c.60:40 brand online / retail partners and c.50:50 UK / international
Fully funded from cash reserves; cash position remains robust
1 Like
Still think ASOS have a lot of room to go up, a lot of the brick and mortar stores have been so poor online, and Amazon hasnât cornered the market (for once).
Wondering what all this means for high streets though.
ASOS webcast on arcadia group acquisition (starts at 30 minute mark roughly)
1 Like
topshop/topman/missselfridge websites now just point to ASOS i.e. you have to use ASOS. Is this a mistake? Boohoo kept the prettylittlething/nastygal/misspap websites independent. It could be ASOSâs move is temporary until they integrate their systems, im not sure.
Part of me thinks asosâ decision to acquire these brands was reactionary based on what boohoo did and they donât know what theyâre going to do with them.
Hmm I disagree as the ASOS model is more of a marketplace. They have been stocking Topshop products for quite a while now so it probably makes it easier for them to just integrate these brands onto their site. They just need to do a good job to keep the brandâs value strong in the minds of the loyalists
1 Like
This could be a poor move on their part. One big advantage of buying a competitor is that you immediately increase your coverage in search engines - ie the more clothing websites you own that rank on the first page of google for, say, âmens trousersâ then the more customers you are going to bring in from search.
So one valid strategy is to buy competitors and keep them âopenâ. This also means you can diversify your audience - ie have a different brand ranking for âmens trousersâ for each age group, so no matter who is searching, they will click on one of your properties.
I think this is the strategy Boohoo took, they specifically alluded to diversifying audience as part of the reason for acquiring Debenhams - itâs an entirely different audience for them so it makes sense to keep the brand alive and separate.
There is likely technical challenges to keeping multiple brands up and running though. Not only do you have to manage multiple websites, potentially running on different underlying code, but you also have to keep the product lines, distribution, customer services etc. up and running as well. That may not have been possible or desirable for Asos to do and it is perhaps better for them to integrate the clothing lines they intend to keep alive into their own website (where they were already selling topshop etc. clothes anyway).
If they donât intend to keep the arcadia group websites up and running, I would at least expect them to eventually redirect them to Asos. Currently theyâve replaced every page on the Topshop site with the same image which takes you to the Asos homepage when you click on it. If they keep this set up for too long they will eventually loose all the historic ranking positions that the Topshop (and other) domain held for individual search terms. Ultimately I would hope to see them redirect like for like pages to their own website (eg redirect the âmens trousersâ category page on Topshop to the same category page on Asos). This way they will effectively consolidate any ranking potential from Topshopâs pages to equivalent pages on Asos.
According to SearchMetrics, Topshop has a traffic index 48% larger than Asos and the two domains only share about 22% of their collective keyword coverage, so it would be a bad move to both loose that larger traffic index and additional keyword coverage through neglecting to properly migrate or relaunch the domains they are now in possession of.
4 Likes
That was quite insightful. Maybe it isnât the smartest decision to remove the websites
Great analysis. I was thinking along the same lines and in contrast with Boohooâs strategy it looks really poor. Theyâve paid circa 300 million just to own brands they already sold on their website; not expanding their audience, not leveraging the brandâs goodwill (website/socials). I now wonder what theyâll do with the brandâs social medias theyâve acquired.
1 Like
FWIW topshop.com now actually 301 redirects to www.asos.com/topshop 
. What a pointless non value add and non-synergistic acquisition.
4 Likes
1 Like
And our latest deep dive into ASOS.
After a bumpy road these last few years, could the Topshop acquisition and pandemic be a new dawn?
I bought ASOS at ÂŁ11 in march so Iâm holding on but its been in the 45-55 range for months now, very solid base. I think the market has changed but fashion is one area where people donât want to buy clothes from amazon/supermarkets so ASOS and boohoo have capitalised, particularly with no Primark online. More bricks and mortar will struggle and they can benefit if they donât blow it.
3 Likes
What the hell just happened??
Itâs an incorrectly displayed share price in the app. It was showing similar on google finance before the market opened.
1 Like
Woke up to discover 5k had been wiped out from my account, not a good start to the day!
Whatâs going on with this share? 
