Boohoo - BOO - - Share Chat

There is always the argument that if these factories didn’t employ children, then these kids would be on the streets, starving and dying.

Empires for thousands of years have been built on the backs of child and slave labour. You may not like it, or approve of it, but it’s a fact. We also have this artificial construct that humans are children until 18 years old, when mother nature and evolution has actually decided that childhood stops at around 12 years old.


This has never been an argument. It’s frankly mind blowing that anyone would make such an argument. It’s a totally false dichotomy to say, well, never mind that people (children or otherwise) are being forced to work against their will, in unsafe and unregulated conditions potentially facing physical and sexual abuse because the alternative is a life of hunger, disease and death? Some choice that is! Imagine if it was your son or daughter, or your parents, being subjected to these choices?

I think the crux it comes down to whether or not an individual thinks it’s acceptable to support a business that engages in the sort of pernicious regulatory arbitrage so you can buy a t-shirt for a quid, knowing that along the way people and the environment have been exploited to the extent that there is material harm being caused. Boohoo’s contempt for people over profit was total - they relied on exploitation of undocumented people in the UK, and were sighted on it long before it came to light.

This isn’t about which newspaper you read or your politics, this is about making sure businesses are held to account, and are sanctioned when they harm people and the planet.

And before we revert to whataboutery on the commercials, the evidence suggests that companies that take ESG seriously perform better than those that don’t.

So you have a choice. Revert to the same old false tropes about “this is how it’s always been and always will be” or start thinking about doing the right thing to create a more equitable environment that reduces harm and builds a future that you’d want your children to live in.


It’s also a fact of history that countries cannot advance economically without abolishing child labour in exchange for education. That’s one reason why these empires perished, not why they existed in the first place.


I wonder how many people who have issues with labour practices of third world nations have ever visited these nations or spoken to these people that only survive day to day because of the pennies an hour they earn.

It’s all well and good boycotting these companies and putting these people out of a job, but until there is an alternative way of living for these people, you are often doing more harm than good.

I’m sort of playing devils advocate here, only because I have been in some of the poorest regions in the world, and know that many of these poor workers would rather have a crap job paying little, than no job at all.

You may sate your own conscience, but you’re not the ones that suffer for it.

There will always be rich people and poor people, that is something that will never change. Even JC knew that.


If you really wish to help people in poorer nations, may I suggest you put a little of your hard earned cash into something like which is something I do every month, and makes a real difference to people.


I work for an investment shop that invests exclusively in frontier and developing markets. We spend as much time considering ESG and development outcomes as we do commercial return, and I can tell you point blank, the people in the countries where we work do not believe for one second it’s should be choice between no work and rubbish work - try telling a mother that has life changing injuries due to non existent safety standards that she should be grateful for the job regardless. You wouldn’t stand for it, so why should she?

On the Microfinance link you shared, while I have a lot of time for MFIs - they have played an important role in providing credit for the financially excluded, they are not a panacea. What you need is wholesale change at scale, at the heart of large businesses, as their supply chains are wide, deep and impact a huge number of individuals and MSMEs domestically and internationally. Where there’s no motivation for change at the management level, it’s in the hands of customers and suppliers to drive this by choosing to work with those companies that do get it. As I previously said, you’ll always have actors that don’t care, but that is a choice on their part, not an inevitability.

Edit: You might find the following of interest. This is the de facto standard in how “the world” currently thinks about building a more equitable future:


Looks like the boohoo founder will be made to give evidence in the US court case.More bad news for this stock.

1 Like

Governance, governance, governance (or lack thereof).


Boohoo to sell all its brands in the Middle East after striking deal with Kuwaits Alshaya group. Boohoo will sell there brands through alshaya groups debenhams franchise stores and online starting later this year.

RBC raise there share price target to £4.10 from £3.80

1 Like

Are they after their pound of flesh?

Why is SP heading downward? I saw this one…

Any implication?

Well the stock has popped the bed in the last month; either it’s the perfect time to buy or it’s a stock to cut losses on tbh.


T Rowe price take a 10% stake in Boohoo they also own a 11% stake in Asos.

1 Like

Boohoo allow media and customers into there Leicester factories to show the improvements they have made.

1 Like

Boohoo crashing again


down another 4%


It’s on my watch list I expect it to dip below £2.00 soon.I have owned this stock before and twice sold for a profit.

1 Like

Boohoo finally lauching the new debenhams website.