Usually the whole industry gets shaken up ⊠not just the âbudget playersâ . As an example look at the saga with Budget airlines. Or the UK Supermarket shake up. The way I look at it is competition is good when the customers benefit.
And you are right many companies will merge or be liquidated.
At the AMA youâll hear Viktor say that theyâre not planning on expanding into USA or China. He worded it better than my memory so weâll wait for it to be posted.
I believe what was meant here is that in the US there are many low cost trading companies [some of them are very big names] and the main differentiator is âserviceâ. So @kuger is simply saying that if there are loads of companies here with low fees the differentiation will have to come through service.
Lightyear currently have no fees except a 0.35% currency conversion charge up to ÂŁ3K/mo.
Stake charges no FX fees on trades. Only on deposits and withdrawals. USD account only.
Revolut - no FX fee on trades. Metal membership required.
All the above donât offer ISAs or SIPPs and have smaller universe of stocks
Can a large legacy company can just copy what a fast moving start up can do. Itâs been seen many times that you canât just copy the features of the challenger and suddenly poof the challengers melt.
If features were food, FT has been on Ramadan all year! I checked back through my app messages the only 2 things released were live pricing and instant bank transfers.