84,000 in equivalent period last year and 50,000 the year before (which is arguably more comparable).
I don’t think they’ll have lost many existing customer. The risk is that their pipeline of new customers is being eroded.
84,000 in equivalent period last year and 50,000 the year before (which is arguably more comparable).
I don’t think they’ll have lost many existing customer. The risk is that their pipeline of new customers is being eroded.
Different client base. Compare the £ new business.
During the lock down period all the brokers saw a growth in client numbers. All have seen a growth drop since then.
Always worth remembering that HL is not in the same market niche as Freetrade - that may change in the future. But for now, HL has more to worry about with Interactive Investor.
Agree with Bitflip.
For now HL & II are direct competition. FT & T212 are direct competition.
Interactive Brokers have entered somewhere in the middle. I see that segment being the long term destination for a lot of the newer price-conscious customers once they start to desire more security for a growing portfolio.
For some customers interactive investor might be more expensive than HL.
I was an ex EQi customer before I saw the light and moved to freetrade and other low cost brokers.
ii tried to make the claim they were cheaper than EQi for most customers but gave a promise that lasted for the initial 6 months that if they were more expensive, they’d refund the difference.
It’s the monthly fees. If HL only charges quarterly fees, and I don’t know the lie of the land there, then it’s possible HL is cheaper for some customers.
I haven’t looked at EQi.
But in general for HL v II ISAs;
HL was cheaper for people holding stocks and making infrequent trades of a higher value. FX is cheaper, particularly above £5k.
II was cheaper for people holding higher values of funds or making a regular stock trades per month.
Assets under administration for HL down by 10% but they made £121.6 million just on customer cash sitting in their accounts in the last six months of 2022!
Savers snub stocks and funds amid turbulence | This is Money
Founders should get a nice big fat payday and can go off into the sunshine and chill
I wonder what this means for the product it’s self, what the buyers have in mind. Strip for profit or change things up or just let it run into obscurity
I doubt we’ll see any significant changes, at 5% earnings yield and no existing debt it’s not exactly distressed.