Doesn’t really occur some of you that the reason there are such an influx of new members coming to the forum and participating in the conversation might be because it was a corner case that was brought to the forefront because of some major happenings in the market? Enough to spurn people to action and kick-up a fuss?
Hate to break it to you, but not everything is a conspiracy. If anything, the influx of users would normally be a good sign, just must not be the case since the opinions raised don’t mesh well with yours, right?
Just because you are an early investor into FT it doesn’t make your opinion any more right than any regular user. @Raul and I had almost this exact conversation in the GME chat and hilariously the accusation of “same person, multiple accounts” was thrown-around there, too.
Increasing the limits set on large trades serve to harm no one. Additionally, the FT team have already demonstrated the functionality to pick and choose where they set their limits in the simple fact that the UK and US stocks have separate ceilings. What is being proposed in this thread is the increasing of that ceiling; nothing more, nothing less.
I agree, it would be great to see FT in France. It would also be great if the users they have now were wholly satisfied with their user experience. From what it seems, the team in charge of making adjustments to the UI is not going to be the team in charge of international expansion so I really don’t even get what that comparison was.