Robinhood Discussion đŸč

Options
The regulator sets rules and guidelines of what’s suitable. In this example RH set its own internal policies of who to allow options trading to, but even failed to adhere to these.

It’s unethical to allow people who you know you shouldn’t and who’ll likely get hurt in the process, so you can make a profit. Freedom yes, but when wide spread use is bad for society it should be restricted and controlled.

Robinhood faces questions over business model after US censures - FT

3 Likes

Right, security at the cost of freedom. I certainly haven’t seen that excuse before. It’s no wonder we’re devolving, people can’t take responsibility for their actions anymore.

Selling order flow, not news about them but despicable and illegal here for a good reason:

"Robinhood had negotiated rates with these high-speed trading firms that were “significantly” higher than the deals other online brokerages had cut, leading to inferior pricing or “execution” on its customers’ orders, according to the SEC complaint.

The group earned these higher fees at the expense of its customers who would have saved $34m combined if they had gone to a competitor between 2016 and 2019, the SEC said. The company neither admitted nor denied the charges."

1 Like

Everyone is responsible for their choices and actions, but so are companies. Robinhood was stealing from the poor and giving to the rich.

3 Likes

Investing with margin at 2.5% interest coming to Robinhood is expected to revolutionise investing and level the playing field for new investors.

2 Likes

http://www.brokeandbroker.com/5595/robinhood-daytrading-massachusetts

1 Like

The whole Twitter thread is fascinating but to mimic scratch cards for the free share is just crazy :eyes:

3 Likes

Difference is, you gotta pay for scratch cards. But I suppose you pay no matter what, there’s no such thing as a free lunch, after all.

2 Likes

Also alarming: that screen https://mobile.twitter.com/petershk/status/1344289059611369473 where it says “your first 1k of margin are included. You’ll only pay interest on [margin over 1k]”. Dark design defaults.

3 Likes
2 Likes

It’s truly shameful to be honest.

6 Likes

Can’t wait for Robinhood IPO. WSB will look for revenge :rofl:

7 Likes

A number of Lawsuits already filed, They promote themselves as helping the little guy but when it came to it they looked after the big guy.

6 Likes

This must be a first

8 Likes
9 Likes

I think the biggest damage here is that they’ve absolutely nuked their brand image and reputation over in the US. When centre left and hard right & far right politicians/rent-a-gobs are in agreement with each other then you know you’ve really done something wrong. Does America have an equivalent of the “Gerald Ratner” moment?

It looks like that, in the last few hours, they’ve also deleted their long pinned tweet that’s been at the top of their profile for years:

image

If the Freetrade team aren’t that busy at the moment, are stuck for things to do and need more excitement in their lives then maybe they should launch in the US asap whilst RobbingHood’s customers are looking for a new platform.

7 Likes

Wow tedcruz and aoc agree! Maybe they both have shares in GME they can’t sell :slight_smile:

This is a double edged sword for free brokers - they don’t want to discourage interest in stocks from new users, but stonks on the other hand are pretty dangerous and people liable to come up with all sorts of crazy accusations when their stonks go down:

  • The app colluded with hedge funds to make me lose money!
  • I lost money on the stock market and my app owes me for the losses!
  • I missed out on generational wealth because Robinhood wouldn’t let me trade
  • Reddit told me this worthless stock would go up forever, but after I bought it went down and I was unable to sell as nobody wanted to buy, I want my money back

It is a market, and every trade has two sides usually one more informed than the other - if market makers don’t want to provide trades, or the market is frozen by curcuit breakers, or they are crushed by demand from users, there’s very little the brokers that depend on the market functioning can do about that. It’s really an insidious position for brokers to find themselves in and short term trades are really not going to work out well for retail investors most of the time, or for their broker.

All that said Robinhood’s approach seems really strange - they should just have taken a neutral position and said there might be problems trading. They probably wanted to avoid legal liability for the potentially massive losses their customers could make on either side of these trades when they can’t get in or out (and will blame them for if the app is at all slow or trades fail). Maybe lots of people are margin trading using RH?

A dangerous type of user for Freetrade too IMO - I wouldn’t be rushing to try to recruit people who would buy GME.

12 Likes

Is anyone able to access any of the recent reviews on the App/Play store?

I’ve seen screenshots of 1-star ratings but would be interested in the reviews too 
 although, being in the UK, I can’t actually access them.

1 Like
2 Likes