Up 40% in the last 7 days.
Likely that the big institutional investors have decided to buy again.
1 Like
“top analyst” with success rate 57%
Almost as bad as flipping a coin …
57% is a lot more than the house edge on a roulette wheel
2 Likes
I don’t believe SpaceX will merge with TESLA, Tesla has plenty of projects in the pipe, plus, Elon has said, He’ll not be taking SpaceX Public for some time.
There will be the Cyber Truck, Tesla cars, Tesla Semi Truck, Tesla Power walls, and Solar Roofs and let us not forget Elon’s battery production whose factories are currently being built.
There are going to be plenty of Products coming from TESLA in the near future, so If you are not in, I’d buy in before it’s too late.
IMHO!
5 Likes
Definitely more products to come. They’re a battery and AI company, that’s their USP. It’s not 4 tyres and a steering wheel.
2 Likes
Magic ball is working i think 
1 Like
I seem to remember Tesla being in talks with a Saudi buyout. Funding Secured?
It’s just incredible how good at teaching he is, taking a complicated topic where the quality of discourse is pretty abysmal and makes good simple explanations and arguments with the principle of charity.
1 Like
About time, POTUS had to do it, chargers to double by end of next year?
Continued glitches in the self drive.
Actual title: “Tesla will release an over-the-air (OTA) software update, free of charge”, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said.
3 Likes
What amazes me is that despite these glitches, self driving is still safer than humans.
I wonder if/when there will be self-driving insurance policies with lower premiums? Maybe this would be a good investment area << Googles driverless car insurers >>
1 Like
That’s what I was thinking without even reading the article. I’ve seen this before where they say “Tesla recall” and then Musk just says they literally just send out the update.
If anything, this shows the benefit over cars that don’t have these kind of updates.
1 Like
I don’t buy that, a self driving car under the supervision of a human is safer than a human alone. They can’t be trusted to drive 100% autonomously. If you look at figures for disengagements where the human is forced to take the wheel because the car is about to do something stupid it tells a different story. Crashes would be far more common if the driver wasn’t allowed to take over and the car was just allowed to make mistakes
1 Like
I think on average, humans are SO dangerous that even with interventions, they are safer. If you are a careful driver, then they are not safer but if you are average or a poor driver, then they are.
This 2019 study looks at how drivers perceive themselves to be better than the average driver and looks at the threshold of acceptance of driverless technology. It is worth a scan through if it interests you (just close the pop-up).