https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/international-community-strikes-a-ground-breaking-tax-deal-for-the-digital-age.htm
Major reform of the international tax system finalised today at the OECD will ensure that Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) will be subject to a minimum 15% tax rate from 2023.
Pillar One will ensure a fairer distribution of profits and taxing rights among countries with respect to the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises. It will re-allocate some taxing rights over MNEs from their home countries to the markets where they have business activities and earn profits, regardless of whether firms have a physical presence there. Specifically, multinational enterprises with global sales above EUR 20 billion and profitability above 10% - that can be considered as the winners of globalisation - will be covered by the new rules, with 25% of profit above the 10% threshold to be reallocated to market jurisdictions.
Pillar Two introduces a global minimum corporate tax rate set at 15%.
At first glance this may seem good. Nevertheless I see no mention to the introduction of a global maximum corporate tax rate. Nor I see mentions to the introduction of maximum tax rates for individuals.
I fear totalitarian winds in disguise are still pushing the sails. I fear if these winds prevail, financial freedom through savings and investing will become increasingly harder to achieve for us of little means.
I’m for the payment of taxes. Within reason. For the benefit of the individuals. Not the bureaucracies, whom are there to serve, not to be served.
I’m for fiscal competition amongst states, for competitions favours the consumer. This agreement goes one step forward in the opposite direction towards harmonisation. One more nail in the coffin of individual rights with the excuse of (alleged) fairness.
https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-october-2021.htm
Not all is bad though:
Double taxation of profit allocated to market jurisdictions will be relieved using either the exemption or credit method.
This is good I think.
I have the impression I’ve read somewhere this agreement aims to ensure corporations pay the taxes they are due in the countries where they sell their products/services. I share that goal. But to give to states the power to establish the minimum tax rate they can impose is, in my view, reversing the natural order of how things ought to work in a liberal democracy where the rights of individuals are sacred ground and limitations to the coercive powers of the state are, or should be, in place.