Hi . New to freetrade. Looking for tips for trading. What to look for and possible trends
Welcome to the forum The best thing to do is browse the site for a bit and get a varied range of views and then only you can make the choice that is best for you. A good start is to add little and begin with ETFs. The link below is very handy for new members and one about ETFs.
Ask your beginners questions here - First Time Investing - Freetrade Community
Be an active member of the forum, read lots and engage with others and your knowledge of investing will increase!
If I had to give any advice itās do your homework on companies. Itās spectacularly easy to get caught up in hype over a company and then get burned when the bubble around it bursts.
Check multiple sources and also watch out for the timing of when early investors can bail out - DARK Trace is a great recent example of what can happen to a share price. I should know - its cost me a few K.
We live and learn - sometimes the only way to learn is to make mistakes.
Hello!
So, just looking for some advice/guidance/approval from more experienced investors.
Iām currently able to invest around 100-150 a month. I began this all with a Ā£100ish initial investment, split across the following:
1 share (Ā£48 at time of buying) in Vanguardās S&P500
1 share (Ā£26 at time of buying) in Vanguardās FTSE100
0.01 share (Ā£25ish at time of buying) in Amazon (lol)
Iām looking to split my investments on a 70/30 basis between ETFS and individual companies that I personally believe will do well in the future.
As it is, I plan on using ETFs as a āsavings accountā that will slowly increase in value over 5-10 years. The individual companies are more of a gamble and are just there to give me a little bit of a thrill! Obviously I intend not to lose out, but of Ā£100 invested, only Ā£30 of that will be split across whichever companies Iām investing in. Most likely things like Amazon, Alphabet, AO etc.
So, I guess Iām looking for a few things here:
- Which ETFs should I invest in to create a nice, diversified āsavingsā pot?
- Whatās the best way to split the investments so that I can get a clean 70/30 distribution? I only ask because not all shares are fractional, so it really makes it a pain in the ass trying to split Ā£100 up when I am committed to spending Ā£48 on my S&P500 alone!
- As Iām in my mid-20s, should I be willing to take more risks or look at investing in stocks that pay more dividends? If so, which ones?
- Any tips for small, individual companies that you believe may provide growth over the next year? Iām specifically looking for cheaper stuff around the Ā£2-Ā£10 mark
I hope this all makes sense!
Thanks
I think this is a sensible approach
Your ETFs currently only cover 2 countries, which reduces your diversification, you may want to consider something more broad.
The simplest thing would be to just track the whole world:
Ā£VWRL - Vanguard FTSE All World
The next simplest would be to split out the world between emerging and developed (so you can pick how much of each you want of each)
Ā£VEVE - Vanguard FTSE Developed World
Ā£VFEM - Vanguard Emerging Markets
If you want to get even more custom you could look at splitting out UK and the rest of Europe, US, emerging and any other countries you want. This might be excessively complicated to manage/balance though.
Ā£VERX - Vanguard Dev Europe ex UK
- UK (FTSE 100)
- USA (SP500)
- Emerging
- Others (Japan etc)
I think without fractionals youāll just have to make the best of it, if you end up 28/72% itās probably not the end of the world
Risk is really a personal preference, if you opened the app and saw your portfolio had lost 30% of its value (as in March) how would you cope with that? If you are happy knowing that in the long run 10+ years you will be better off, then great - take on more risk.
If you wanted a bit more risk you could consider ETFs that give exposure to factors with greater risks.
Ā£VVAL - Vanguard Global Value Factor- This tracks companies which are priced cheaply and therefore considered more risky
Ā£WLDS - MSCI World Small Cap - This tracks smaller companies which are generally considered more risky that larger ones
or you could pick whatever individual companies suit your risk.
Iād say generally ignore dividends when making decisions (see my freetrade thread on why) they shouldnāt have a material impact on your total return in the long run.
Iām not going to recommend anything, Iād say buy what you know.
I loosely follow the semiconductor market so some of my individual picks (ASML,TSMC, AMD) have centred on that, but donāt just buy something because a stranger on the internet likes it.
It doesnāt have to be massive professional knowledge of the sector, it can even something simple. For example my investment in BYND was just because I was a big fan of the Beyond Burger (especially after it was finally available in the UK) and knew plant-based foods were a big growth area. Being close to something means hopefully you can feel consumer sentiment shifting before it appears in earnings reports.
So far my worst decisions have been buying things I donāt really understand but following other investor sentiment / advice.
Iām also relatively new but as some early learnings, I would echo what Cameron said about sticking to what you know closely (see Warren Buffetās circle of competence), and not being baited into FOMO, particularly by what other investors are recommending.
For what itās worth, asking for stock tips from random people on the internet is the equivalent of getting horse racing tips from the guy in the pub.
Buying shares just because they are in a certain price range isnāt a great idea, unless youāve established that the price values the company at an unwarranted discountā¦But if thatās the case, why isnāt everyone else buying these shares and forcing the price upā¦? I think youād be better off putting that money into your ETFs or saving it until you can afford whatever you believe is a sound investment.
Some good advice above, digging into businesses/sectors you are familiar with what you know is as good a starting point as any.
I second this. Itās a boring strategy, I grant. Youāre not going to win big. But you are (all things being equal) either going to (at best) grow steadily or (at worst) limit your losses.
But picking individual stocks when youāve only got Ā£100-odd a month to invest? The odds are against you. Youāve far more chance of losing it all through a few wrong picks than you have of making a fortune through a few right picks.
If youāre still determined to try and pick winners, I canāt recommend individual stocks. I can only recommend that you do your research, and (a) choose carefully, and (b) donāt commit more to individual picks than youāre prepared to lose.
How about buying 5 shares of T (AT&T) to start? Each share would generate 0.52 USD per Q. That is $10.4 USD per year. In 3 years one of 5 of your shares is free. That is of course if you buy at current price, and they will keep the same dividend. Still, not bad to get something for free.
Now I have to put a disclaimer here. I am certainly not an expert, this is just for entertainment purposes.
Before doing anything I would evaluate Tās debt, viability that it always will be in business- who knows- might be someone will put in orbit some satellites and Tās moat will be gone? Might be dividends will be cut, etc etcā¦
Index funds are broad bet on economy. Held one of S&P 500 fund a while ago, sold out a bit early, but at the moment it is not that far away where I bought it. So in a few years it moved nowhere. With individual dividend paying stocks you could get something in return while you wait.
I am really disappointing that O is not available on freetrade. It pays monthly dividend, and at some point it went down ā¦ Now it is going back again. IMHO it is quite safe REIT company- majority of the properties held were holding strong during shutdown.
But I am just a person on internets, so do your own diligence. It is your hard earned money after all.
The most diversified fund is something S&P 500 related. But why do you want to diversify so bad? Letās say now, during Covid 5% of companies are literally doing the best ever. Probably 10% are on a verge of bankruptcy. 20% are doing ok- meaning not bankrupt, but not making a lot of profit. 10% are doing good. Of course, I just pulled these numbers of a belly, but the idea is that when diversifying to much you will get good and bad at the same time and sometimes bad will drag things down.
0.01 of Amazon will make you poor. How much will it go up- $1 per year? What is the point?
Sorry to be rude, but this is terrible advice. Iāve included a couple of videos which explain why quite concisely.
A broad bet on the economy is much less risky than a bet on an individual company. A broad bet is basically a bet that companies will innovate and create better products and ultimately a more prosperous world, historically this has been pretty consistent, while throughout this individual companies have risen and fallen all the time.
Diversification is how you manage risk, thatās why for most long term individual investors low cost index funds are the most sensible approach. Itās not reasonable to expect stock pickers to consistently beat the index (unless the are over exposed to a particular risk factor)
Dividends are not free money, they are part of your total return paid as cash rather than capital gains. You should not be picking stocks because of the companyās dividend policy, a high dividend yield should not be used as an indicator for greater future returns.
If you wanted to look at T you should evaluate the business and its risks (as you mention its moat looks to be threatened) and come up with an estimate of itās total return. Then you could look at the dividend policy and see how much of that total return will be paid as cash (if thatās relevant to you for tax reasons etcā¦)
Again, I do not think it is a good idea to be putting the idea out to novice investors, or indeed any investor, that receiving a dividend in a down market is the same as selling shares you own at a loss during a down market.
The whole point of being in the market for the long-term is not to sell at a loss*, so if one needs income during a down market, dividends are one of the better ways to get there.
*Providing the company you own, or ETFs, are still viable and will likely recover.
Agree, for someone new to the game, its better to start off learning how stocks with dividends make you money rather than jumping head first into day/swing trading. Im still new to the game after nearly a year and I much prefer the peace of mind of dividend paying stocks (regardless if they introduce cuts or not).
I wasnāt proposing day/swing trading, almost no one has the dedication to actually achieve genuine results there.
I was specifically referring to the idea that income can be consistently generated by selling down shares.
Well if we continue this topic for entertainment purposes onlyā¦
I would avoid gurus on the youtubeā¦ Realize that their primary job is to get paid by adds, donations and views. Many of them have ZERO financial education, or never worked in anything finance related. Some of them sell courses, access to their private chats, etcā¦ Some channels even add their credentials as PH d as if is relevant if the chap finished some humanitarian universityā¦
I came to this conclusion myself when looking at a few channels. Here is my 5 cents:
1 pushing bitcoin. You cannot be serious on that. Just listen what Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger has to say on bitcoin. These 2 actually achieved something that most of people will never achieve by investing.
2 pushing ridiculous stocks. GAME STOP (are you serious???) You are pushing Blockbuster in Netflix era!!! Game stop is based on declining business model!!! Everything is becoming download only, INSTANT download!
3 pushing BATH AND BEYOND! Are you serious??? This is also dead business. In pair with Pier 1 imports that went bankrupt.
4 Telling people to sell good stocks. One dude was telling sell FACEBOOK, since recession is coming. Well, letās see- FB reached 52 week high in recession!
5 Pumping penny stocksā¦
There is much more I could add.
Do your own diligence. Read from a source. Go to investor relations website of any company, read 10K, see what is business about, risk factors, financial information, listen to conference calls, follow Q earnings. Think about the moat of any business. Can given business just disappear with no trace? For example Walmart, Target, Costco can sell anything that Pier 1 imports is selling. Probably even cheaper.
This is very good advice, donāt trust any youtube gurus pushing that rubbish.
As you say they are often just creating clickbait content for ads, trying to sell a worthless course or worse pumping their own positions to dump on naive investors.
Edit: Iām assuming you arenāt grouping educational videos, like the ones I linked in the same category as the stock picking gurus.
I havenāt looked at youtube videos that you posted. I am just saying āin generalā. It seems since āinvestingā area is not regulated, a lot of people making money on youtube by giving an advice that does not cost anything for them, is not regulated in any way, and has zero negative consequences for them. So in general anything on youtube has to be taken with grain of salt.
Also I probably would advise something very controversial here toā¦
Lose some money at the beginning of your investment journey. See how it feels. Because it is really painful when you realize that after many hours (of whatever you are doing for work) you have nothing to show, and have to work hard again, and investing is not easy. It is a job. It requires research, time and effort. If it was easy, everyone would be millionaires. There is zero entry barrier, a lot of people are doing this, but not everyone is successful (in long run).
I probably should put a disclaimer here too. I do own T shares, on Freetrade and in other account. Owned for quite some time and received dividends already made a few shares essentially free. So dividends do work.
I think this is almost guaranteed as a consequence of novice investing rather than on purpose? I mean even experienced/ professional investors donāt get it right 100% of the time. I get your overall point though. Once youāve burnt your fingers on some hype stock (ā¦e.g. Kodakā¦) you will hopefully learn a valuable lessonš
Ok the videos Iām linking are just explaining economic theory by summarising some of the more influential academic papers (which are cited). They arenāt trying to sell something, suggest a particular stock or claiming any new knowledge like lots of the āguruā type videos.
Itās basically the equivalent of a teacher reading from a textbook. I donāt think many people are going to read 20 pages of a paper, but they can see the summary and if something doesnāt make sense they can dig into the underlying academic research, therefore removing the need to trust the person explaining it.
I donāt know how long youāve owned AT&T but the share price has declined over the 6 month, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year periods where as the S&P 500 has grown over all of the same periods. Itās very hard to agree that the dividends have been āessentially freeā (at least not in the sense of risk-adjusted return).
Looking at the 5 year period, this is a very rough estimate of the difference in total returns. You could calculate the total return more accurately for whatever other period you wanted.
Metric | AT&T | S&P 500 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
5 Year growth | -11.31% | +60.67% | +71.98% |
Average growth | -2.26% | +12.13 | +14.396 |
Average Yield | ~6% | ~2% | ~-4% |
Total Return | ~+4% | ~+14% | ~10% |
So AT&T has returned about ~10% per year less than the S&P 500 for this time period. My point here is not that AT&T has performed poorly compared to the passive strategy, just that the metric that makes sense is total return, not growth or yield individually.
No one is suggesting they donāt work, just that they arenāt a good indicator, or more important than total return.