This breaks my heart and it really upsets me at times,I invested in Freetrade and if I am honest I let my dreams/imagination get carried away. I honest to god did not believe that a fintech could be so slow in onboarding features. I look at lightyear as one example who have been granted permission for European expansion already.
There is literally a thread on Reddit claiming that Griffin from Citadel came to the UK to meet with Adam to push for securities lending when FT has been talking about securities lending for years already.
Superstonks collective intelligence at its bestā¦
So much misinformation. People need to understand that FT is doing exactly the opposite.
Building low cost no bullshit/no CFD/no PFOF/no leverage investment platform
with benefiting retail consumer as a fondamental core value of the platform
Everyone will have a point of view on which broker suits them best. Lots of factors come into play⦠For example, size of portfolio, frequency of trading, customer service level needed, need or not for particular features, ethics, knowledge/experience as an investor etc etc
So one personās poor expensive broker will often be anotherās good value for money broker.
This isnāt comparing like for like, theyāre operating as an appointed representative through Risksave. Freetrade did this initially but got fully authorised before launching.
From the risksave site: āThe AR regime is very common in the FinTech space, where technologists often lack the operational experience to create a traditional Financial Services firm and the AR to market route is so popular.ā
Advantageās & disadvantages to each approach, short term vs long term. I think the timing of the each launch validates their approaches.
Part of me thinks why donāt they just go full on 212 mode and have CFD accounts.
I think the fact you can loose your stocks* to share lending proves in my mind that freetrade has moved itās ethos considerably. Of course thatās my own personal interpretation of the situation, and not a statement.
You can loose your stocks* to share lending on 212 also.
*No matter how rare the possibility is, itās still a possibility. Noether company will offer a blank cheque either.
I am not putting my money with a broker holding Estonian licence without a clear path to profitability personally
They will lure new customers in by offering attractive FX fees and then either raise prices or introduce new fees like t212 did.
Securities lending is a brilliant way for FT to finance the platformās growth, build new features that you are so desperately requesting Brian, while keeping the platform low cost.
Misinformation is bad. Isnāt best way to deal with it for FT to front up to a couple of genuine concern questions that are being asked? The FT decision seems to have been made not to answer them. I want to keep this from becoming circular/unconstructive so I wonāt go over the issues again.
Agreed. I recommend AJ Bell to anyone I know with whoās really into masochism. In fact, I might start a niche OnlyFans and record myself every time I trade - someoneās going to love watching that.
Forgive me for the sense of humour failure but Iām having to make a life impacting reassessment of my SIPP provider. Never expected to be in this position. Treated as a joke here and with indifference by Freetrade.
Final edit: I really donāt think thereās anything the FT forum can gain from me nor I from it. Itās been an interesting and informative 3 and a half years. Goodbye