I downloaded the csv file with all US, UK stocks and ETFs and ran it through my FA spreadsheet. Not so useful for investing, but I found it sort of interesting anyway, so thought I’d share. Here’s some datapoints for 100% ownership for trailing year for all of Freetrade’s current offerings combined into those two categories:
US stocks would have a 3.5% total return compared with -8.5% for UK/ETFs. (This was due to a small minority of firms who have performed terribly - I’m looking at you, Debenhams, Metro, Superdry, etc., corrected for some errors in the data.)
UK/ETFs are very low volatility compared to benchmarks (beta 0.68), whereas the US stocks are weighted towards the riskier end of the spectrum at 1.11.
Aggregated projected growth in earnings for US offerings are high at 17.8%, UK/ETFs slightly lower at 14.3%.
UK/ETFs = moderate debt. US = higher.
38 UK/ETFs pay out more than 5% in dividends, compared with just 4 US stocks.
UK/ETFs are rated as slightly undervalued at current market rates. Not so for US stocks.
UK stocks will start to outperform once sterling turns. It’s an easy ride to 1.4 on GBP USD. That will in turn mean US returns are hurt if you are purchasing in Sterling.
Apart from the vastly superior investment case which is proven here, anyone find investing in UK firms more interesting? Guess we’re a little biased here, but there just seems like far more variety than the endless US large caps of industrials, techs and congloms, and I have >50% of my overall portfolio in US equities.
That’s the danger of chasing yield without looking at the company as a whole. If the yield is high because of a collapsing share price it’s usually only a matter of time before they cut the dividend.
Absolutely. To be honest, I don’t even consider dividends when I look to invest at all. If I get one, a bonus, but I don’t factor them into the considerations to begin with.
Yes, of course. But over the long term I don’t think the evidence supports the conclusion that concentrating on dividend yield is more beneficial than looking at a broader set of ‘value’ metrics. Each to their own, though. I don’t know if there’s necessarily a ‘right’ way to do this.