I didn’t. Probably because I lived in two different mainland European countries and worked in a third one. The investment culture is different in these three big EU economies. No thing similar to British Gas shares: Thousands 'told Sid' 25 years ago - BBC News to galvanise the masses. So I did not see that the UK business case would easily translate. And I am not the only one who saw/sees this. From time to time I look back at the forum and I notice that there used to be someone with the handle @Bitflip. He made many interesting comments and on more than one occasion pointed out that a European expansion would be super expensive and fraught with problems. Freetrade does not have the money for a European story and moreover in my opinion won’t have one anytime soon.
I think that having more features is not going to help in itself (No matter the loud voices on this forum. We should remember that a tiny fraction of Freetrade active users say anything on this forum.) I suspect that it will have to adjust its business model in the coming months to effectively compete in the UK.
I wonder if when the history of freetrade is written the last 2/3 years will be seen as a wasted opportunity where the company had a great position but failed to capitalise on it.
Snow as a Snail.
How long it took to get web version.
I moved my ISA already, if FT ever goes public or gets sold, I’ll be happy.
A colleague of mine said his brother suggested T212.
On the other hand SIPP is interesting, no platform fees.
The web page “menu” needs attention as it is misleading. For example: “Personal Pension” can be read as “Personal” and “Pension”, where as it is one menu. @acamp - FYA please.
I think he’s referring to the spacing between the words, which might give the impression that each word links to a separate page. However, when you hover over the words, the colour changes, confirming that they aren’t individual pages.