Believe me, it’s not relevant. I haven’t seen Fool subscription stocks, but the ones on their free articles are like they pick names out of a hat. Many times I’ve seen their articles cite a yield and dividend cover and call it “research”. A basic stock screen.
Further, the different writers can give you market whip lash! I’m pretty sure one of their writers recommended a stock last month only to have another writer disavow it the next day. Which is probably because at the bottom of their free articles their is a disclaimer stating that the writers don’t represent Fool’s views.
Thanks for that. I’m not sure if “I’ll happily disavow my previous reply” would be quite the right way of putting it, but I’ll certainly be adding a much large pinch of salt to anything I read from the Fool.
This is on top of the large pinch I already add because they’ve been going for how-many-years-now but their list of “We hit it gold!” stocks they given when trying to entice you to subscribe is awfully short. Makes you question just how many misses they’ve had over the years, so.
I’d recommend comparing those with a benchmark. For example if you’re thinking about following their recommendations for tech stocks then you could compare the return that you’d have got if you’d bought those stocks with the performance of the Nasdaq over the same time period.
That’ll help you see whether they’re picking exceptional stocks or if their picks are just performing as well as the market in general or perhaps slightly worse, even though the stock prices have increased.
There’s more to benchmarking than that, here’s Investopedia’s (slightly jargon full) guide -
True that you should take their recommendations with a pinch of salt, and some of the writers will be better than others. but there’s nothing wrong with the OP’s suggestion of adding them to the universe
Also you can read their articles without a subscription if you refresh the page and spam the escape key to stop client side scripts running as soon as the text appears, you didn’t hear that from me
Most of their outperformance derives from Amazon, Netflix and Domino’s. You could perhaps rely on their past performance but there is no guarantee that their new picks will continue outperforming the market.
I would say there is no guarantee anywhere with anything is it?
I was just pointing out that it would be nice to have their stock on freetrade as it works well for me at the moment but I need to use different platform for buying it.
In ideal world I would like to buy everything on freetrade.
Oh, my apologies, for some reason I had an impression you wanted Motley Fool’s stock picks on Freetrade rather than the actual companies
It may help if you ask for missing stocks in the #stock-requests category, one thread per stock (e.g. Amazon - AMZN). That way it will be clearer for Freetrade which particular stocks are more popular and may prove to have more demand among other users too