Just been to the beach
Also, met a successful Uber driver who knew a lot about investing. He is not wealthy - but he is rich. He has plenty of savings, passive income from money-generating real estate (mortgaged). That pays for rent and mortgages. Also, he sometimes side-hustles with Uber. He does not need the Uber job but it pays for holidays and nights out with the family.
He knows how to make and not lose money. No stock market trading. The relatively new but very affordable car - a highly depreciating asset and probably the second most expensive purchase of any family - is generating cash every week - as a side hustle.
How did he get there? He had a normal job with a pension plan back in the day.
Financial education is what made the difference - he got it from his parents. If it’s too late for us, it’s our turn to give that gift to our kids. We have the internet now.
Every week he drives a car around - on busy nights and mornings - and picks up UberPool and UberX passengers - Uber sends him just under USD 1,000.
Uber keeps the minority of all earnings from rides. It’s not a tech company.
Softbank has invested in Uber.
So, I thought it would be worth revisiting WeWork:
Softbank put the Sprint “A-team” in charge of saving WeWork - CNBC:
- Masayoshi Son, Marcelo Claure and Ron Fisher are all on the Sprint board and are the three SoftBank executives now calling the shots at WeWork.
Let’s look at Sprint.
Investing does not require a math(s) degree
Even when you invest billions. Buy low, watch some value creation happen. Sell higher. If you can.
This is not machine learning with matrix on matrix multiplications.
A lot of stuff in accounting and equity trading is just basic calculus…
…covered in strange jargon so the outsiders have to pay fees to someone “in the know” or spend countless days studying boring material. Complexity-and-sometimes-or-often-BS-by-design.
When you look back at Softbank’s Sprint investment and divestment you learn that the maths behind it was just weird
… SoftBank acquired its majority stake in Sprint for $7.65 a share in 2013.
How do you have a profit? Sell at a higher price than $7.65 a share.
SoftBank successfully engineered a sale of Sprint for $6.62 per share to T-Mobile in 2018.
So they got out with a net loss.
Then you find out that Sprint used to be a cool-ish company until Softbank arrived:
When SoftBank bought Sprint, it was the third-largest U.S. wireless carrier by subscribers. When SoftBank sold, Sprint was a distant fourth behind Verizon…
“Sprint has been an unmitigated disaster,” said Moffett. “Sprint has contracted steadily since SoftBank bought it, even in a growing wireless market. Their only hope for an exit is to pray their deal to sell it to T-Mobile is approved.”
Read more - https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/26/softbank-taking-masayoshi-sons-sprint-playbook-to-wework.html
At least the resulting “new” company - T-Mobile US, which already exists and is not a new company - “will be” third largest - “again”.
Valuation is not an exact science
Correction:
…WeWork is actually “valued” at USD 8 billion.
The Bill Gates of Japan
Who’s running Softbank?
“He’s a very calculating strategist with a knack to see what the next big thing is,” said Ulrike Schaede, a professor of Japanese business at the University of California, San Diego. “Every time he does a big bet like this, like with Vodafone, the stock price of SoftBank plummets and everyone says he’s gone crazy and six months later people say, ‘Wow, he’s got a plan.’”
“He’s not an establishment player,” Steve Vogel, a professor of political science and the chair of the Center of Japanese Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, told Ars. “He’s a very aggressive, risk-taking, entrepreneurial person. He’s been colossally successful and had some colossal failures. But overall he’s made an impact on Japan—he’s the closest thing to Bill Gates in Japan.”
Source - How Sprint’s new boss lost $70 billion of his own cash (and still stayed rich) | Ars Technica